A- de 1992
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Raimundo Mendoza Arouni
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Corrección
- Rechazo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Rechazó la demanda de la referencia porque el actor no realizó, en el término establecido, las correcciones sugeridas de incluir como normas acusadas, los Decretos 2183 y 2250 de 1991 por considerar ya habían subrogado las disposiciones acusadas por él.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la presente demanda.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia procede el recurso de súplica ante la Sala Plena de esta Corporación, de conformidad con lo preceptuado por el artículo 6º, inciso 2º. del Decreto 2067 de 1991.
- Tercero. En firme esta decisión, públiquese, insértese en la Gaceta Constitucional y archívese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.